ABSTRACT
resumen está disponible en el texto completo
Abstract Recent studies have reported the occurrence of thrombotic phenomena or coagulopathy in patients with COVID-19. There are divergent positions regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of these phenomena, and current clinical practice is based solely on deductions by extension from retrospective studies, case series, observational studies, and international guidelines developed prior to the pandemic. In this context, the aim was to generate a group of recommendations on the prevention, diagnosis and management of thrombotic complications associated with COVID-19. Methods: A rapid guidance was carried out applying the GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks and an iterative participation system, with statistical and qualitative analysis. Results: 31 clinical recommendations were generated focused on: a) Coagulation tests in symptomatic adults with suspected infection or confirmed SARS CoV-2 infection; b) Thromboprophylaxis in adults diagnosed with COVID-19 (Risk scales, thromboprophylaxis for outpatient, in-hospital management, and duration of thromboprophylaxis after discharge from hospitalization), c) Diagnosis and treatment of thrombotic complications, and d) Management of people with previous indication of anticoagulant agents. Conclusions: Recommendations of this consensus guide clinical decision-making regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of thrombotic phenomena in patients with COVID-19, and represent an agreement that will help decrease the dispersion in clinical practices according to the challenge imposed by the pandemic.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , Embolism and Thrombosis , Consensus , AnticoagulantsABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: la carga sintomática de pacientes con neoplasias mieloproliferativas crónicas Filadélfia negativas (NMC-PhN) afecta la calidad de vida (CV). Existen escalas para evaluar la magnitud de los síntomas, una de ellas, MPN-SAF-10. En nuestra región existe escasa información sobre CV de pacientes con NMC-PhN. Objetivos: estimar el puntaje de calidad de vida con la escala MPN-SAF-10 en pacientes con NMC-PhN atendidos en el Hospital de San José (Bogotá, Colombia) y explorar asociaciones entre el tiempo de tratamiento, carga de complicaciones y el efecto en la CV. Material y métodos: estudio de corte transversal analítico para evaluar CV basada en carga sintomática de pacientes con NMC-PhN del Hospital de San José (Bogotá, Colombia). Se realizó análisis descriptivo y estratificado de calidad de vida, tratamiento citorreductor y de diferentes complicaciones, así como pruebas de asociación de los puntajes de riesgo de cada enfermedad con sus respectivos puntajes de CV. Resultados: en 64 pacientes la escala MPN-SAF-10 documentó medianas de puntajes globales de CV de 3 (RIC 1-6), MPN-SAF-10 de 20 (RIC 8-32). Un 49% de los pacientes tuvo algún grado de alteración (30% moderada y 19% severa), sin diferencias entre las tres enfermedades. Los puntajes de CV no variaron entre las NMC-PhN. El tratamiento y duración del mismo no se correlacionaron con la escala de MPN-SAF-10 (hidroxiúrea r: - 0.27; ruxolitinib r: 0.12). Conclusiones: en pacientes con NMC-PhN, la evaluación de CV con la escala MPN-SAF-10 evidencia algún grado de afectación a pesar del tratamiento; ésta es útil para objetivar dicha afectación y debe implementarse en la práctica clínica. (Acta Med Colomb 2019; 44: 82-90).
Abstract Introduction: the symptomatic burden of patients with Philadelphia negative chronic myelopro liferative neoplasms (NMC-PhN) affects the quality of life (QL). There are scales to evaluate the magnitude of the symptoms; one of them, MPN-SAF-10. In our region there is scarce information on QL of patients with NMC-PhN. Objectives: To estimate the quality of life score with the MPN-SAF-10 scale in patients with NMC-PhN treated at Hospital de San José (Bogotá, Colombia) and to explore associations between treatment time, complication load and the effect on the QL. Material and methods: Analytical cross-sectional study to evaluate QL based on symptomatic load of patients with NMC-PhN from Hospital de San José (Bogotá, Colombia). A descriptive and stratified analysis of quality of life, cytoreductive treatment and different complications was carried out, as well as association tests of the risk scores of each disease with their respective QL scores. Results: in 64 patients the MPN-SAF-10 scale documented medians of global QL scores of 3 (RIC 1-6), MPN-SAF-10 of 20 (RIC 8-32). 49% of the patients had some degree of alteration (30% moderate and 19% severe), without differences between the three diseases. The QL scores did not vary between the NMC-PhN. The treatment and its duration did not correlate with the MPN-SAF-10 scale (Hydroxyurea r: - 0.27, Ruxolitinib r: 0.12). Conclusions: in patients with NMC-PhN, the evaluation of QL with the MPN-SAF-10 scale shows some degree of affectation despite the treatment; this is useful to objectify this affectation and should be implemented in clinical practice. (Acta Med Colomb 2019; 44: 82-90).